occupied Palestinian territory 2019 (part of 2018-2020 HRP)

Strategic Objective 3

The ability of vulnerable Palestinians to cope with the protracted crisis, including environmental threats, is supported, while solutions to violations and other root causes of threats and shocks are pursued.

Objectives and indicators contributing to SO

Indicator	Unit	In need	Target	Targeted (%)
IN0: # of local NGOs included in the HRP in partnership with indernational organizations (UN or INGO)		0	66	N/A
IN1: Prevalence of severe and moderate HHs food insecurity in the overall population		0	33	N/A
IN1: # of HRP 2019 projects’ entered into the Information Management System updates coordinated with the line ministries		43	43	100.0%
IN1: # of HH supported with training and tools for self-recovery or protection measures	Households	0	1,375	N/A
IN1: # of cluster partners with effective emergency procurement procedures in place or stockpiled assistance accessible to support	Partners	20	2	10.0%
IN1: # of schools partially/fully prepared for use as DES	Schools	57	18	31.6%
IN1: # of schools supported in preparing and/or responding to emergencies	Schools	304	257	84.5%
IN1: # of students, parents and school staff benefiting from school-based psychosocial support services	People	324,020	262,624	81.1%
IN1: # of students benefiting from remedial education services	Students	24,789	24,100	97.2%
IN1: # of WASH emergency preparedness and response plans at all levels (partners, municipalities, etc.)	Plans	0	2	N/A
IN1: # of WASH interventions to mitigate and respond to flooding		0	6	N/A
IN1: # of meetings organized	Meetings	0	12	N/A
IN1: # partners / area focal points trained and equipped for sub-national coordination	Partners	0	6	N/A
IN1: # WASH related advocacy products/events	Reports	0	4	N/A
IN1: # of learning events organized/shared	Events	0	0	N/A
IN1: # of people reached by non-technical awareness sessions	People	0	12,270	N/A
IN1: # of public statements (including Press Releases and Tweets) raising issues of humanitarian concern and support for increased respect for humanitarian principles, IHL and IHRL following HCT and/or OCHA briefings		0	6	N/A
IN1: % of people targeted in the HRP that receive humanitarian assistance	Percentage	100	60	60.0%
IN1: # of vulnerable HH assisted to repair damaged shelters	Households	4,000	4,050	101%
IN1: # of cluster or sector-specific humanitarian needs assessments conducted	Assessments	6	5	83.3%
IN1: Multi-year strategic plan is updated, as required, before end of 2019	Yes/No	1	1	100.0%
IN1: # of regular joint HRP monitoring and evaluation products completed and disseminated		0	2	N/A
IN1: # of updated IACP and cluster-specific contingency plans, including SOPs, and seasonalisation plans in place (Gaza)		0	2	N/A
IN1: # of local NGOs included in the HRP with self-led projects		0	65	N/A
IN1: % of HRP projects with strong protection mainstreaming	Percentage	0	78	N/A
IN1: Average # of days required to process and award a grant via the oPt Humanitarian Fund	Days	0	90	N/A
IN1: # of joint or coordinated advocacy events, including at the HCT level	Events	0	31	N/A
IN1: # of briefings conducted on humanitarian principles and/or the protection crisis driving humanitarian needs in the oPt	Briefings	0	138	N/A
IN1: # of neutrality inspections of UNRWA installations and premises		0	0	N/A
IN1: # of HH assisted to rehabilitate substandard housing unit	Households	29,286	5,343	18.2%
IN1: # of HH assisted with shelter protective materials	Households	1,000	2,484	248%
IN1: % students who are better supported following education-related violations, escalations in the conflict or natural disaster	Percentage	0	61	N/A
IN1: # of HH provided with climate protection assistance (emergency shelter or household NFIs in-kind or in cash)	Households	8,780	12,377	141%
IN1: # of WASH facilities benefitting from essential maintenance and operational items		0	101	N/A
IN1: % of eligible HH received timely post-demolition shelter assistance	Percentage	100	100	100.0%
IN1: % of assisted HH living in upgraded unit in accordance with minimum standards	Percentage	100	100	100.0%
IN1: # of people protected from flooding	People	206,435	127,293	61.7%
IN1: # of individuals received Temporary Shelter support	People	11,200	5,040	45.0%
IN1: # of students supported following education-related violations, escalations in conflict or natural disasters	Students	324,020	262,624	81.1%
IN1: # of beneficiaries supported through non-agricultural livelihoods	People	0	0	N/A
IN1: Tonnes of food locally produced and procured	Tons	0	6,120	N/A
IN1: # of beneficiaries receiving food in-kind	People	0	1,082,830	N/A
IN1: # of assisted HHs living in adequate temporary shelter	Households	2,500	431	17.2%
IN1: # of individuals received support through Temporary Shelter Assistance	People	14,000	2,483	17.7%
IN1: # of individuals benefiting from Cash for Work (CfW)	People	0	74,438	N/A
IN1: # of coordination meetings held on a regular basis	Meetings	225	225	100.0%
IN1: # of individuals received Temporary Shelter support	People	1,680	20	1.2%
IN1: # of individuals able to be supported with shelter NFIs (cash/in-kind) at the onset of an emergency	Individuals	610,000	3,750	0.6%
IN2: # of clusters that have mapped their partner's operational presence and response capacity (West Bank)		6	5	83.3%
IN2: % of HRP projects with 4(M) or 4(B) gender with age marker coding	Percentage	0	78	N/A
IN2: % of timely monitoring field visits conducted to projects funded by humanitarian pooled fund allocations, with relevant cluster and inter-sectoral support	Percentage	0	35	N/A
IN2: Humanitarian Needs Overview is updated with new data by end of 2019	Yes/No	1	1	100.0%
IN2: % of HHs received timely post-demolition shelter response	Households	100	100	100.0%
IN2: # of capacity building initiatives for UNRWA staff on neutrality		0	0	N/A
IN2: % of assisted families reported improvement in living conditions	Percentage	100	100	100.0%
IN2: # of inter-sectoral humanitarian needs assessments conducted	Assessments	0	4	N/A
IN2: FSS beneficiaries targeted who report improved coping strategies	People	0	0	N/A
IN2: # of individuals benefiting from other conditional cash support	People	0	2,461	N/A
IN2: # of individuals able to be sheltered at DES according to agreed standards	Individuals	114,000	34,000	29.8%
IN2: # of sector reports and updates to WASH partners and other relevant inter/intra sector coordination bodies	Reports	0	12	N/A
IN2: # HHs under risk of displacement have adequate shelter/NFIs stocks according to ICCG contingency plans	Households	300	670	223%
IN2: # of capacity building events organized	Events	0	5	N/A
IN2: # of beneficiaries receiving food vouchers	People	0	251,860	N/A
IN3: % of identified vulnerable communities and health facilities in West Bank and Gaza have better preparedness to cope with impact of current and future crisis	Percentage	0	99	N/A
IN3: # of individuals benefiting from other unconditional cash support	People	0	25,755	N/A
IN3: % of HRP projects reflecting a high level of Community Engagement	Percentage	0	66	N/A
IN3: # of HHs/individuals drop in emergency caseload due to provision of durable climate protection		8,780	3,166	36.1%
IN3: Number of existing dedicated coordination personnel in place	Yes/No	0	3	N/A
IN3: # of common decentralised systems/platforms created, maintained and made accessible to the Humanitarian Country Team (HCT)	Systems	0	19	N/A
IN4: % of reduction of individuals in the emergency caseload as a result of sustainable climate protection activities	Percentage	0	10	N/A
IN4: # of common operational datasets and functional information datasets created/updated	Data	0	12	N/A
IN5: # of information products produced to improve situation awareness	Products	0	50	N/A
IN5: % of individuals in need of support with shelter NFIs (cash/in-kind) at the onset of an emergency	Percentage	0	6	N/A
IN6: % of individuals able to be sheltered at DES according to agreed standards	Percentage	0	29	N/A
IN7: % of people in need with increased WASH capacity during emergencies and shocks	Percentage	0	61	N/A
INA: # of farmers, herders, breeders, fishers receiving inputs and services (Individuals, based on HH average size: West Bank 4.8, and Gaza Strip 5.6 unless specific data are available.)	People	356,000	160,141	45.0%
INC: # of dunums made productive or with improved production capacity (full and partial land rehabilitation, piping and irrigation system, seeds and seedlings distribution, etc.)	Dunum	22,420	60,419	269%
IND: # of greenhouses rehabilitated	Houses	3,122	1,110	35.6%
INE: km of agricultural roads rehabilitated	Kilometers	484	169	34.9%
INF: # of water wells rehabilitated	Wells	139	211	152%
ING: km of water carrier lines rehabilitated or provided	Kilometers	183	100	54.6%
INH: m3 of water storage rehabilitated or provided	m3	187,000	206,220	110%
INI: # of livestock and poultry farms/sheds rehabilitated		3,100	2,927	94.4%
INK: kW of renewable power supply systems	Kilowatt(kW)	8,000	3,208	40.1%
INL: m2 of home garden rehabilitated or established		60,000	40,000	66.7%
INM: # of boats rehabilitated or equipped		340	0	0.0%
INN: # of beehives supported		16,000	0	0.0%

Download

As PNG

As XLSX